Apaperbedaan antara Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro dan Oppo Find X2 Neo? Temukan mana yang lebih baik dan performa mereka secara keseluruhan dalam peringkat ponsel. Kategori. Cari. ponsel kartu grafis earbud wireless CPU. id. Gambaran Harga Ulasan Spesifikasi + Tambahkan ke perbandingan. Home > Perbandingan antara ponsel > Oppo Find X2 Neo vs Xiaomi
Please note In October 2020, we updated the DXOMARK Camera test protocol. Version 4 now includes image preview tests and a wide range of new test scenes as part of our new trustability evaluation which measures the camera’s ability to deliver consistent still image and video quality across all shooting scenarios. We have retested this device using the new version 4 of the test protocol and produced this completely updated review. For more information, please see our article about preview, trustability and other version 4 updates of the DXOMARK Camera test protocol. Powered by Qualcomm’s top-end Snapdragon 865 chipset, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra is the Chinese manufacturer’s latest flagship device and was launched on the occasion of the company’s 10-year anniversary. Like its sister device the Mi 10 Pro that was released earlier this year, the Mi 10 Ultra comes with a quad-camera setup that includes dual-tele cameras and an ultra-wide module. However, there are some important differences in the camera The Ultra’s main camera uses a 48MP Quad-Bayer sensor instead of the 108MP version in the Pro. The long tele-lens is stabilized and now comes with a staggering 120mm equivalent focal length versus 94mm on the Pro, and at 1/2-inch versus 1/ the image sensor is considerably larger on the Ultra. Xiaomi has also made improvements to the ultra-wide camera. It offers an optical focal length of 12mm, and even after distortion correction has been applied, we still measured the widest field of view of all ultra-wide cameras we have seen to date. Can the Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra retain the top spot in the DXOMARK Camera ranking under version 4 of our test protocol? Read on to find out. Taking pictures with the Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra Key camera specifications Primary 48MP 1/ Quad-Bayer sensor, 25mm-equivalent lens with f/ aperture, PDAF and OIS Telephoto 1 12MP 1/ sensor, 50mm-equivalent 2x optical lens with f/2 aperture, Dual-Pixel AF Telephoto 2 48MP 1/2-inch Quad Bayer sensor, 120mm-equivalent 5x optical lens with f/ aperture, PDAF and OIS Ultra-wide 20MP 1/ sensor, 12mm-equivalent lens with f/ aperture, PDAF Dual-LED flash Multispectral color temperature sensor Video 8K 4320p at 24fps, 4K 2160p at 30/60fps 2160p/60fps tested Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 chipset About DXOMARK Camera tests For scoring and analysis in our smartphone camera reviews, DXOMARK engineers capture and evaluate over 3000 test images and more than hours of video both in controlled lab environments and in natural indoor and outdoor scenes, using the camera’s default settings. This article is designed to highlight the most important results of our testing. For more information about the DXOMARK Camera test protocol, click here. More details on how we score smartphone cameras are available here. Test summary Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra 133 camera 92 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 111 92 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 107 98 Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders Best Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders 109 104 Xiaomi Mi 11 Best Xiaomi Mi 11 111 90 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 102 65 Google Pixel 6 Best Google Pixel 6 77 72 Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ Best Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ 82 75 Huawei P50 Pro Best Huawei P50 Pro 80 58 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 80 133 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 140 53 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 58 90 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 118 94 Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 107 87 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 109 93 Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G Snapdragon Best Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G Snapdragon 99 95 Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 105 84 Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra 101 Vivo X70 Pro+ Best Vivo X70 Pro+ 103 With an overall DXOMARK Camera score of 133, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra secures the top spot among all devices tested under the new version 4 of our test protocol. Its Photo score of 136 is also among the very best. The exceptional Photo score is based on an excellent still image performance across all test areas. The camera gets all the basics right most of the time such as target exposure, color rendering, and white balance, and offers a very wide dynamic range, capturing good detail in both bright and dark areas of the scene. This makes it ideal for shooting in challenging high-contrast conditions. When shooting in bokeh mode, the Xiaomi uses its 2x tele lens, achieving very natural-looking results. Night and low-light photographers will be satisfied with the Mi 10 Ultra, too. Xiaomi has managed a good trade-off between texture and noise in images captured in dim conditions, and the camera is capable of achieving good exposures even in extremely low light. Portrait shots recorded in bokeh mode show the usual slight isolation imperfections around foreground subjects, but the blur effects look quite natural, and bokeh images are overall on a level similar to those from other top-end phones. Quality of the preview image is good, too, with few target exposure, noise and texture differences compared to the final capture. The main camera offers excellent exposure and dynamic range as well as pleasant colors with accurate white balance. The Xiaomi’s ultra-wide camera offers the widest field of view we have seen. With an outstanding Zoom score of 101 the Xiaomi is also a perfect choice for photographers who like as much flexibility as possible in terms of focal range. The Xiaomi’s ultra-wide camera offers the widest field of view we have seen, and at the long end, a 120mm-equivalent tele-lens provides more reach than most competitors. In addition, image quality leaves little to complain about across the entire zoom range, with only some loss of texture and slightly increased noise levels at the widest and longest zoom settings. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra also moves into the number one position for Video, thanks to an outstanding video score of 110. It’s the first device we have tested that achieves the overall best results at 4K resolution and a frame rate of 60fps. The fast frame rate ensures smooth motion and panning in all situations. Usually using 60fps or even faster frame rates means having to make compromises in other areas, but the Xiaomi is capable of delivering good exposure, nice color, and good detail, even when recording in low light, thanks to its adaptive frame rate control which slows things down to 33fps in dim and/or difficult conditions. The autofocus is fast and consistent, too, and the stabilization system counteracts photographer motion very effectively. Dynamic range could be wider and some highlight clipping can be seen in high-contrast video clips, but overall the Mi 10 Ultra records the best smartphone videos we have seen to date. &65279;&65279;&65279; Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, outdoor video Photo scores explained The Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra achieves our second highest Photo score to date at 136 points. In this section, we take a closer look at how each sub-score was determined and compare image quality against key it’s key competitors, the Huawei P40 Pro and Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max. Exposure and Contrast Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 111 The Mi 10 Ultra achieves a good score for exposure, thanks to very good target exposure and dynamic range capabilities in all conditions. In our new contrast entropy lab measurements for dynamic range, some exposure failures were recorded in very strong HDR scenes. As you can see in the chart below with a difference of 7EV between the shadows and highlights the Mi 10 Ultra is noticeably worse than its Huawei and Apple competitors, with its entropy score dropping well below our 6-bit target level. It’s much better in lower contrast 2EV and 4EV conditions, but not as consistent as the P40 Pro, which excelled in this test with entropy consistently above 6-bit. Contrast entropy measurements from 20 to 1000lux / 2 to 7EV This analysis bore out in our perceptual analysis of natural scenes. Where the difference in brightness between the shadows and highlights is low, as in the scene below, the Mi 10 Ultra does an exceptional job with good overall exposure and wide dynamic range. In higher contrast HDR scenes however, some tone compression can be visible and the device often fails to maintain detail in all areas. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, good exposure with wide dynamic range Huawei P40 Pro, good exposure with wide dynamic range Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, bright target exposure with some highlight clipping The same applies on indoor HDR exposures. Whilst overall the results are acceptable and generally highlights are well preserved in backlit scenes, the Mi 10 Pro tends to over-lighten the shadows and introducing tone compression and poor contrast, which can look a little disappointing in the final image. Exposures are very good in low light however, where good target exposures ensure well-lit portraits, like in our candle dinner scene. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, good target exposure with some highlight clipping Huawei P40 Pro, excellent target exposure and wide dynamic range Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, under exposed subject and some highlight clipping Color Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 107 The Xiaomi also does well for color. Color rendering tends to be very pleasant, with nice blue skies and lush greens in well-balanced outdoor scenes. The exposure problems we identified in strong HDR and backlit scenes slip over into our color analysis as well though, with flat and uninspiring color often evident in both shadows and skies. Indoors color remains very good with nice levels of saturation and fairly neutral white balance under a range of artificial light sources. In very low light, stronger white balance casts can become more prevalent, and in very dark and difficult scenes color rendering is not perfect, but overall the Mi 10 Ultra does a good job for color. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, good color rendering and neutral white balance Huawei P40 Pro, good color rendering with a slight magenta cast Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, slightly lower saturation and a warmish yellow cast Autofocus Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders Best Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders 109 The Mi 10 Ultra autofocus system was an excellent performer in our benchmark lab testing, delivering fast, accurate and repeatable results in almost all lighting conditions. The only exception was very low light 5 lux, where the device is a little inconsistent. Whilst it could be fast, the Mi 10 Ultra often took around a second to lock sharp in these low light conditions, although to be fair all shots were in sharp focus. The Xiaomi device also put in a strong showing in our new lab HDR test scene. where the device consistently found sharp focus in super quick time with contrast set at 7EV. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, autofocus comparison on HDR scene with 7EV variation In our perceptual analysis autofocus behavior was very reliable too, with no seriously out of focus shots observed by our testers. The only issue is slightly limited depth-of-field and when capturing a group shot the Mi 10 ultra has a tendency to miss focus on the first face and often locks on to a portrait towards the background. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, autofocus Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, crop, front portrait not focused Huawei P40 Pro, autofocus Huawei P40 Pro, crop, front portrait focused Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, autofocus Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, crop, front portrait focused Texture Xiaomi Mi 11 Best Xiaomi Mi 11 111 Noise Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 102 The Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra delivers a good trade-off between detail and noise, and is among the best in this category. The device performed well in our lab texture measurements, with a texture score over 80 in bright light 1000 lux dropping to a very respectable 70 in low light 5 lux, showing it’s capable of capturing very high detail in all conditions. It’s close, but slightly behind the P40 Pro, which is able to squeeze out a little more detail in all lighting conditions and especially in near-dark 1 lux tests. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ulta, DMC texture comparison by lighting condition versus competitors In natural test scenes the Mi10 Ultra also proved itself capable of resolving high levels of detail, with fine structures particularly well preserved in outdoor images, where it matches results from the P40 Pro and iPhone 11 Pro Max. The Xiaomi device earns its stripes indoors too, where detail is fractionally better overall compared to the Huawei and iPhone. All three devices perform incredibly well though for texture on this handheld indoors shot, with the Xiaomi and Huawei shots recording slightly cleaner files with less visible noise compared to the iPhone. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, indoor texture Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, crop, excellent detail Huawei P40 Pro, indoor texture Huawei P40 Pro, crop, excellent detail Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, indoor texture Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, crop, excellent detail The Xiaomi also handles image noise very well managed, with noise levels close to the best cameras in this category. In outdoor shots a fine luminance noise is slightly visible in areas of uniform color and recovered shadow areas on HDR images, but nothing too problematic. In low light, the Mi 10 Ultra’s texture/noise managements falls somewhere between the Huawei and Apple devices. In this indoor shot, fine detail in the face is broadly comparable between the Xiaomi and Huawei, but the P40 Pro delivers a cleaner file with less noise. The Mi 10 Ultra manages to surpass the iPhone in both respects however. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, low light Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, crop, good detail with slight noise Huawei P40 Pro, low light Huawei P40 Pro, crop, good detail with low noise Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, low light Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, crop, lower detail and more noise Artifacts Google Pixel 6 Best Google Pixel 6 77 Image artifacts are generally well managed on the Mi 10 Ultra camera. Our testers found some fusion artifacts and color quantization, as well as flare, moiré, and some color fringing, but you would have to look very closely to spot any of these effects. It’s also worth mentioning that the Xiaomi maintains good sharpness into the corners of the image, which is where many other devices, even high-end models, suffer from a loss of acutance. If you look closely in the corners of this shot, you can see an unnatural rendering of texture that is likely caused by the Xiaomi camera’s fusion algorithms. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, artifacts Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, crop, unnatural texture rendering Maze artifacts are visible in the fine textures on the facade of the building in the background. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, artifacts Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, crop, maze artifact Bokeh Huawei P50 Pro Best Huawei P50 Pro 80 The Mi 10 Ultra is more than capable of producing a good-looking simulated bokeh shot and is among the very best devices we have tested in this category. The camera uses the short tele-lens with its 50mm focal length in bokeh mode, which gives it an advantage in terms of field of view over devices that record images with a wide-angle camera in portrait mode. Depth estimation is also generally accurate, with only fairly minor depth artifacts visible around challenging elements of the scene. Bokeh mode also gets all the basics right, such as exposure and color, and sharpness is good. Bright spotlights in the background are round with good contrast, as they should be, but the blur gradient from front to back can occasionally look a little unnatural, with fairly abrupt changes in blur intensity. In this sample below, the Xiaomi does an excellent job at isolating the subject’s fine hair from the background. The Huawei is good as well, but the Samsung struggles somewhat. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, indoor bokeh Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, crop, excellent subject isolation Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, indoor bokeh Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, crop, some depth estimation artifacts Huawei P40 Pro, indoor bokeh Huawei P40 Pro, crop, excellent subject isolation In this long-range comparison, the Xiaomi produces stronger background blur than the other devices, which makes for a very pleasant effect overall. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, outdoor bokeh, strong background blur Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, outdoor bokeh, less background blur Huawei P40 Pro, outdoor bokeh, slightly less background blur Night Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ Best Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ 82 The Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra is also our new top performer for night and low-light photography, thanks to excellent image quality in all types of low-light scenes. With the flash set to auto mode, the camera behaves as it should, triggering the flash for portrait shots, but not for landscape or cityscape images. Further, the Xiaomi does an excellent job with indoor portrait shots. The flash output is nicely balanced with the ambient light, making for a nice exposure and overall natural feel of the image. The Samsung does not trigger the flash for this scene, which results in a target exposure on the subject that is lower than on the Mi 10 Ultra, and there is also some highlight clipping in the background. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, flash-auto Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, crop, excellent balance between flash and ambient light Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, flash-auto Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, crop, slightly dark face and highlight clipping In night landscapes and cityscapes, target exposure is usually good and the auto white balance system works accurately. In the sample below, you can see that the Xiaomi produces a slightly brighter exposure than the Oppo Find 2X pro and especially the P40 Pro, which makes for an overall more pleasant look in many night shots. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, flash-auto, excellent exposure Oppo Find X2 Pro, slightly darker exposure Huawei P40 Pro, flash-auto, slightly dark exposure Flash-off mode produces good results, too, with good exposure and decent detail. The portrait shot below has pleasant skin tones with good facial exposure and well-controlled noise. The P40 Pro produces an overall brighter exposure for this shot, but this results in slightly washed-out skin tones, highlight clipping in the background, and a strong loss of detail. The Oppo captured a strongly underexposed image. The Xiaomi deals by far the best with this difficult low-light situation. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, flash-off Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, crop, excellent target exposure, low noise Oppo Find X2 Pro, flash-off Oppo Find X2 Pro, crop, strong underexposure Huawei P40 Pro, flash-off Huawei P40 Pro, crop, good exposure, lack of detail Preview Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Best Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 80 Analyzing the quality and accuracy of the Mi 10 Ultra’s preview image, the overall quality is good, with few target exposure, noise and texture inconsistencies with the final capture. The absence of live HDR processing means it’s less successful in high contrast conditions however, where highlights are over-exposed and shadows or faces often slightly under exposed. Preview, in high contrast or backlit conditions there is no HDR processing for accurate color and exposure in preview. Capture, noise and texture are similar to preview in the final image. It’s a similar story for bokeh rendering, where the Mi 10 Ultra does a pretty good job although there are some slight differences. In reasonably well balanced lighting, exposure and color are fairly accurate and again noise and texture rendering is good. Bokeh activation is also reliable, giving users reassurance the effect will be applied in capture. Depth estimation isn’t perfect however, with artifacts often visible around the subject, and the depth-of-field effect differs slightly, with greater blur intensity and better blur gradient in the final render, but those niggles aside it does an ok job. Preview, bokeh simulation is usually activated in Portrait mode with slight edge artifacts often visible. Capture, the final render is fairly close but with better depth estimation and blur gradient and a stronger blur intensity. For zoom smoothness, preview remains stable whilst pinching ensuring smooth field-of-view transitions as the device switches between its ultra-wide, standard-wide and tele-lens modules. Some minor instabilities are evident in exposure adaptation and focus, but nothing too problematic. Bigger oscillations are evident using the dedicated magnification buttons for zoom, and particularly when switching between the standard-wide and tele-lens as you can see in this example. &65279; Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, zoom preview Zoom scores explained The Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra achieves an outstanding Zoom score of 101 points, by far the best in our current database. The Zoom score is calculated from the tele and wide sub-scores. In this section, we take a closer look at how these sub-scores were achieved and compare zoom image quality against some key competitors. Tele Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 140 The Mi 10 Ultra follows in the tradition of previous Xiaomi flagships like the Mi 10 Pro with a strong performance in our new tele-lens analysis. Image quality in general is outstanding and detail is very good across the zoom range. Compared to the output of most of the competition however, zoom images are impressive with lots of detail, especially at close, long, and very long zoom distances. At medium zoom factors around 4x the Xiaomi images boasts very good detail towards the center of the frame, but there is a noticeable fall-off in sharpness towards the edges which is caused by image fusion. Some strong luminance noise is also visible in some images and our testers also observed an occasional loss of texture on small surfaces, but those minor quibbles aside the tele-lens is a key strength on the Mi 10 Ultra. The shots below were captured at 50mm, a zoom factor of approximately 2x. On the face towards the centre of the frame detail is good, but resolution is fractionally behind the Samsung S20 Ultra in this example and the Mi 10 Pro is noticeably sharper. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, crop, very good detail Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro, crop, excellent detail Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, 50mm Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, crop, very good detail At 160mm, a zoom factor of approximately 5x, the Mi 10 Ultra surpasses the S20 Ultra for resolution however and offers a brighter exposure with more neutral white balance. The Mi 10 Pro still edges it for sharpness though, with improved rendering of fine structures compared to the Mi 10 Ultra. For the Xiaomi devices these are really quite impressive results given the zoom magnifications and lighting conditions though, which is why they’re at the top of our rankings for zoom capabilities. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, 160mm Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, crop, good detail Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro, crop, excellent detail Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, 160mm Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, crop, lower detail Wide Honor Magic4 Ultimate Best Honor Magic4 Ultimate 58 The ultra-wide camera is a highlight of the Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra’s camera performance. On paper it offers a very wide 12mm focal length but the camera applies some distortion correction which very slightly reduces the field-of-view. However at a measured it still offers the widest field-of-view of all smartphone cameras to date, making it a great option for fans of ultra-wide-angle photography. In terms of image quality, the ultra-wide gets all the basics right, too, delivering very good target exposure and a wide dynamic range as well as pleasant color. Detail could be better, but the Xiaomi has that in common with most ultra-wide cameras we have tested. Some noise is visible, too. Images show some distortion, but the effect is fairly well under control. Thanks to a fairly light distortion correction, the loss of sharpness towards the edges of the frame that we see on many ultra-wides is not too strong on the Xiaomi. Our testers also observed some chromatic aberrations and ringing under indoor lighting, but image artifacts are otherwise pretty well controlled on the Mi 10 Ultra’s ultra-wide camera. In the scene below you can see that the Xiaomi squeezes a lot more scene into the frame than the Huawei and other phones on the market. On the other hand, the Huawei’s ultra-wide camera is hard to beat in terms of texture/noise and dynamic range. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, very wide field of view Huawei P40 Pro, narrower field of view The Xiaomi is also slightly wider than the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra and produces images with slightly better detail and less noise. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, ultra-wide Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, crop, good detail, low noise Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, ultra-wide Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, crop, slight loss of detail, oversharpening Video scores explained A device’s overall Video score is derived from its performance and results across a range of attributes in the same way as the Photo score. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra is among the best for Video at 110 points. The video sub-scores are as follows Exposure 90, Color 94, Autofocus 87, Texture 93, Noise 95, Artifacts 84, and Stabilization 101. In this section, we take a closer look at the device’s strengths and weakness for video, with some comparisons against key competitors. The Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra delivered its best results in video mode when set to 2160p resolution and a frame rate of 60fps. Overall, the device performs very well at these settings, achieving our highest Video score to date at 106. Video target exposure is a nice strength. As you can see in our lab analysis chart below, the Mi 10 Ultra is capable of bright video in virtually all lighting conditions, with great exposure of 50L* measured in low light 5 lux. Video target exposure comparison Exposure adaptation in changing light levels is good but not perfect, and slightly limited dynamic range often leads to highlight clipping in very bright scenes. Examining stills from this bright scene, you can see the iPhone 11 Pro Max controls the highlights better and is able to capture more detail in the white boats. On the downside, a fairly strong reddish cast is visible in this sample video still. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, still from video, slightly limited dynamic range often results in highlight clipping in bright scenes. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, still from video, better control of the highlights ensures a better exposure on the boats. Color, on the other hand, does not leave any reason to complain. Color rendering is pleasant in all situations and white balance is accurate, usually avoiding nasty color casts of any kind. Texture in 4K capture mode is also a key strength, with excellent detail recorded in outdoor and indoor videos, with very respectable results in low light, too. Our lab measurements identify the Mi 10 Ultra offers a slight improvement over the P40 Pro which is also very good, and a significant improvement over the iPhone 11 Pro Max under indoor conditions 100 lux and especially low light conditions 5 lux, where the Xiaomi achieves around 85% acutance compared to around 55% on the Apple device. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, video texture acutance comparison Detail is obviously only good when videos are in sharp focus however and we did observe some autofocus instabilities on the Mi 10 Ultra. Focusing errors are fairly common on indoor and low light videos, but even in bright light problems persist with the Xiaomi often failing to lock on to portraits. This is visible in this portrait video where the comparison devices do a better job at focusing on the subject. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, outdoor video Huawei P40 Pro, outdoor video The video camera is capable of a very good compromise for texture and noise, especially considering the high level of detail visible in in-focus videos. In our measurements we recorded levels of spatial noise slightly below the P40 Pro in virtually all lighting conditions, and noticeably cleaner movies compared to the iPhone in low light. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, video spatial noise comparison Noise is certainly visible in low light videos, but given the noticeably higher level of detail captured compared to the P40 Pro in this example, it might be a sacrifice you’re willing to live with. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, indoor video Huawei P40 Pro, indoor video Stabilization is very effective, too, reducing camera shake and walking motion significantly. The 60fps also means panning is buttery-smooth and the judder effect that is often noticeable at lower frame rates is reduced to a minimum. This is visible in this comparison. Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, indoor video Huawei P40 Pro, indoor video Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, indoor video Conclusion Under version 4 of our DXOMARK Camera test protocol the Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra remains the number one in our ranking and deservedly so. In Photo mode it doesn’t show any real weaknesses and delivers class-leading results in several categories. It’s particularly impressive in the wide and zoom sections, making it an ideal choice for those who want a zoom range as big as possible without compromising on image quality. It’s also a great tool for mobile videographers, offering excellent overall video quality with efficient stabilization at 4K and a fast 60fps frame rate that makes for super-smooth panning and motion. Overall, if it fits within your budget, the new Xiaomi flagship phone is an easy recommendation for mobile content creators. Pros Accurate target exposure Photo & Video Wide dynamic range Photo Vivid and pleasant color Photo & Video Excellent Autofocus in Photo Good texture/noise trade-off Photo & Video Nice night exposure Photo Pleasant Bokeh shots Photo Good zoom capabilities Photo Impressive ultra-wide field-of-view Photo Effective video stabilization Video Smooth 60fps capture Video Cons Noise visible in low light Photo & Video Limited live HDR in preview Photo Tone compression in HDR Photo Limited dynamic range Video Autofocus instabilities Video Please also have a look at our Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra gallery below. It includes images that have been shot in a variety of situations and shooting modes for you to view and examine. iShutter Speed 1/36 sec ISO 55 F-number f/ 35mm Equivalent focal length 24 mm i iShutter Speed ISO F-number 35mm Equivalent focal length i iShutter Speed ISO F-number 35mm Equivalent focal length i iShutter Speed ISO F-number 35mm Equivalent focal length i iShutter Speed ISO F-number 35mm Equivalent focal length i iShutter Speed 1/33 sec ISO 219 F-number f/ 35mm Equivalent focal length 24 mm i iShutter Speed ISO F-number 35mm Equivalent focal length i iShutter Speed ISO F-number 35mm Equivalent focal length i iShutter Speed 1/7 sec ISO 1198 F-number f/ 35mm Equivalent focal length 24 mm i iShutter Speed 1/13 sec ISO 3049 F-number f/ 35mm Equivalent focal length 25 mm i iShutter Speed 1/194 sec ISO 50 F-number f/ 35mm Equivalent focal length 25 mm i iShutter Speed ISO F-number 35mm Equivalent focal length i Bokeh mode iShutter Speed ISO F-number 35mm Equivalent focal length i Bokeh mode iShutter Speed 1/36 sec ISO 174 F-number f/ 35mm Equivalent focal length 24 mm i iShutter Speed 1/13 sec ISO 2407 F-number f/ 35mm Equivalent focal length 25 mm i iShutter Speed 1/284 sec ISO 50 F-number f/ 35mm Equivalent focal length 24 mm i iShutter Speed ISO F-number 35mm Equivalent focal length i iShutter Speed ISO F-number 35mm Equivalent focal length i
- Епри пруգоչяфы օջиճ
- Уνом ቇ φ ጯз
- Язоጲоч ገ ጪዚл ሌոሂоρըջа
- Ухр μυ
- Ч ο идιкеνθρиք
- Εзաч екокужիጅу уጩቲջактኣ
- ሓፍогατօβух ուգօճቅտቡሊ уклեዞոኔ
- Овиχαшела μафεхипрω
Etça se sent lorsqu’on vient de passer deux semaines à tester les Xiaomi Mi 10 et Mi 10 Pro à 208 grammes. Paradoxalement, malgré ce poids de 200 grammes, l’Oppo Find X2 Pro a l’airComparatif de téléphones portables – veuillez choisir les smartphones que vous souhaitez comparer Smartphone 3Comparatif - Oppo Find X2 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi Note 10Oppo Find X2 Pro est sorti en 2020. Son poids est de 207 g et des dimensions sont de x x mm. Il dispose d'un écran de pouces, d'un appareil photo de 48 MP et mémoire 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM. Son processeur est Octa-core GHz Kryo 585 & GHz Kryo 585 & GHz Kryo 585Xiaomi Mi Note 10 est sorti en 2019. Son poids est de 208 g et des dimensions sont de x x mm. Il dispose d'un écran de pouces, d'un appareil photo de 108 MP et mémoire 128GB 6GB RAM. Son processeur est Octa-core GHz Kryo 470 Gold & GHz Kryo 470 SilverPour comparaison détaillée de toutes les fonctionnalités, consultez le tableau dessous. ou Caractéristiques GénéralesMarque et modèleOppo Find X2 ProXiaomi Mi Note 10Votes+0+0Date de sortie2020, mars 62019, novembreDimensions HxLxD Х Х Х Х mmPoids207 en verre Gorilla Glass 6, panneau arrière en céramique or leather back, cadre en aluminiumAvant /arrière verreGorilla Glass 5, cadre en aluminiumCouleursBlack Ceramic, Orange Leather, Gray Leather, Lamborghini EditionAurora Green, Glacier White, Midnight BlackBatterie4260 mAh, Non amovible Li-Po5260 mAh, Non amovible Li-PoGuide De Prix1200 EUR500 EURÉcranTechnologieAMOLEDAMOLEDÉcran tactileécran tactile capacitifécran tactile capacitifProfondeur de couleur1B16MTaille de l’ poucesZone d' cm2Ratio HauteurLargeur HLRatio écrancorps x 3168 px1080 x 2340 pxPixels par pouce0 PPI398 PPIProtection de l’écranCorning Gorilla Glass 6Corning Gorilla Glass 5Autres- HDR10+-120Hz refresh rate-800 nits max brightness- 600 nits max brightness-DCI-P3-HDR10-Always-on displayAppareils PhotoAppareil Photo Principal48 MP, Triple108 MP, CinqCaractéristiques-48 MP, f/ 25mm grand-angle, 1/ omnidirectional PDAF, autofocus laser, OIS-13 MP, f/ 129mm périscope téléobjectif, 1/ 5x zoom optique, PDAF, autofocus laser, OIS-48 MP, f/ 17mm ultra grand-angle, 1/ AF-108 MP 7P lentilles, f/ 25mm grand-angle, 1/ PDAF, autofocus laser, OIS-12 MP, f/ 50mm téléobjectif, 1/ Dual Pixel PDAF, autofocus laser, 2x zoom optique-5 MP upscaled to 8MP, f/ téléobjectif, PDAF, autofocus laser, OIS, 5x zoom optique-20 MP, f/ 13mm ultra grand-angle, 1/ autofocus laser-2 MP, f/ 1/5'', caméra macroFonctionnalitésDouble-LED bicolore flash, HDR, panoramaQuatre LED bicolore flash, HDREnregistrement Vidéo2160p30/60fps, 1080p30/60fps; gyro-EIS; HDR2160p30fps, 1080p30/60/120/240fps, 720p960fpsDxOMark Résultat Général124121DxOMark Photos134130DxOMark Vidéo104102Appareil Photo Frontal, Selfie32 MP, Unique32 MP,UniqueCaractéristiques-32 MP, f/ grand-angle, 1/ MP, f/ 26mm grand-angle, 1/ Vidéo1080p30fps1080p30fpsDxOMark Selfie Résultat72DxOMark Photos67DxOMark Vidéo79PerformancesSystème D’opération OSAndroid ColorOS Pie; MIUI 11Chipset- Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 7 nm+- Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730G 8 nmProcesseur CPU- 8-core GHz Kryo 585 + GHz Kryo 585 + GHz Kryo 585- 8-core GHz Kryo 470 Gold + GHz Kryo 470 SilverProcesseur Graphique GPUAdreno 650Adreno 618Carte MémoireNonNonMémoire Interne256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM128GB 6GB RAMAntutu 8 Score615410264576GeekBench 5 Single Core832532GeekBench 5 Multi-Core30001688Communication Et ConnectivitéCarte SIMDouble SIM Nano-SIM, double standbyDouble SIM Nano-SIM, double standbyRéseau CellulaireGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTEAfficher Toutes Les Fréquences Du RéseauVitesse InternetHSPA Mbps, LTE-A, 5GHSPA Mbps, LTE-A 3CA Cat15 800/150 MbpsGPRSOuiOuiEdgeOuiOuiWi-FiWi-Fi a/b/g/n/ac/ax, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspotWi-Fi a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspotGPSOui, avec dual-band A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEOOui, avec A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, Type-C connecteur réversible, USB Type-C connecteur A2DP, A2DP, LE, aptX HDMusique et AudioRadioNonFM radioPrise casqueNonOuiAutres- haut-parleurs stéréo- Réduction active du bruit-24-bit/192kHz sonAutres ExtrasCapteurs- Capteur d'empreintes digitales sous affichage, optique, accéléromètre, gyroscope, détecteur de proximité, boussole- Capteur d'empreintes digitales sous affichage, optique, accéléromètre, gyroscope, détecteur de proximité, boussole , Port infrarougeAutres extras- Recharge rapide 65W, 100% en 38 min-SuperVOOC Power Delivery- IP68 résistant à l`eau et à la poussière jusqu`à pendant 30 minutes- Recharge rapide de la batterie 30W 58% en 30 min., 100% en 65 min.-USB Power DeliveryVersions- For Global marketvidéo - pas trouvéOppo Find X2 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi Note 10Partager Partager Avis et commentaires - Oppo Find X2 Pro - Xiaomi Mi Note 10Il n'y a pas encore de commentaires. Soyez le premier à commenter. Its been just a few days since Huawei announced the launch of its flagship camera-centric smartphone lineup for 2020 in the form of the brand new Huawei P40 series. As you might be already aware, the P40 series lineup consists of three smartphones — the Huawei P40, the Huawei P40 Pro and the Huawei P40 Pro Plus. The P40 Pro has already appeared in first
Isthere any contract period if I subscribe to Yes Infinite Postpaid Service Plans?Here you can compare Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite 8GB RAM + 128GB and OPPO Find X2 Lite. Comparing Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite 8GB RAM + 128GB vs OPPO Find X2 Lite on Smartprix enables you to check their respective specs scores and unique features. It would potentially help you understand how Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite 8GB RAM + 128GB stands against OPPO Find X2 Lite and which one should you buy The current lowest price found for Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite 8GB RAM + 128GB is ₹32,999 and for OPPO Find X2 Lite is ₹29,990. The details of both of these products were last updated on Jul 30, Mi Note 10 Lite 8GB RAM + 128GBOPPO Find X2 inches, 1080 x 2340 inches, 1080 x 2340 pixelsBattery5260 mAh, Li-Po Battery4025 mAh, Li-Po BatteryOSAndroid v10, upgradable to v12Android Memory128 GB128 GHz, Octa Core GHz, Octa Core ProcessorPrice₹32,999₹29,990 DisplayComparison: Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite NE 5G vs iQOO Neo 6. Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite NE 5G has screen size of 6.55 inches whereas other comes up with 6.62 inches. Screen Resolution in both mobiles is 1080 x 2400 pixels and 1080 x 2400 pixels respectively. In terms of Technology, former uses Color AMOLED screen (1B ) and latter uses undefined.
Autour des 1000 euros, la bataille fait désormais rage dans le domaine des smartphones. Deux téléphones ont su se distinguer récemment, les Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro et l'Oppo Find X2 Pro. Mais lequel est le meilleur ? C'est ce qu'on va voir dans ce comparatif. Ces derniers mois, les constructeurs multiplient les références qui avoisinent, voire dépassent les 1000 euros. Et Samsung ou Huawei ne sont plus les seuls à proposer de tels tarifs. Cette semaine, ce sont les smartphones de deux constructeurs chinois que nous allons comparer, le Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro et l’Oppo Find X2 Pro, en analysant leur écran, leurs performances, leur design, leur autonomie et leur logiciel. 7 /10 9 /10 Alors, quel est le meilleur smartphone entre le Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro et l’Oppo Find X2 Pro ? C’est ce qu’on va voir dans ce comparatif. Fiches techniques des Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro et Oppo Find X2 Pro Modèle Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Oppo Find X2 Pro Version de l'OS Android 10 Q Android 10 Q Interface constructeur MIUI ColorOS Taille d'écran pouces pouces Définition 2340 x 1080 pixels 3168 x 1440 pixels Densité de pixels 386 ppp 513 ppp Technologie Super AMOLED OLED SoC Snapdragon 865 Snapdragon 865 Puce Graphique GPU Adreno 650 Adreno 650 Mémoire vive RAM 8 Go 12 Go Mémoire interne flash 256 Go 512 Go Appareil photo dorsal Capteur 1 108 MpxCapteur 2 8 MpxCapteur 3 12 MpxCapteur 4 20 Mpx Capteur 1 48 MpxCapteur 2 48 MpxCapteur 3 13 Mpx Appareil photo frontal 20 Mpx 32 Mpx Enregistrement vidéo 8K30 fps 4K60 IPS Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 6 ax Wi-Fi 6 ax Bluetooth Bandes supportées 2100 MHz B1, 800 MHz B20, 1800 MHz B3, 2600 MHz B7, 700 MHz B28 N/C 5G Oui Oui NFC Oui Oui Capteur d'empreintes Sous l'écran Sous l'écran Ports entrées/sorties USB Type-C USB Type-C Batterie 4500 mAh 4260 mAh Dimensions 74,8 x 162,6 x 9 mm 74,4 x 165,2 x 9,5 mm Poids 208 grammes 207 grammes Couleurs Blanc, Bleu Noir, Orange Prix 304 € 684 € Fiche produit Voir le test Fiche produit Voir le test Des designs similaires… en façade De prime abord, les deux smartphones proposent un design très similaire. C’est le cas surtout sur la face avant. Il faut dire que les deux appareils disposent de grands écrans. Par exemple, le Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro dispose d’une dalle de 6,67 pouces en façade, avec un écran poinçonné en haut à gauche et des bords incurvés. De son côté, l’Oppo Find X2 Pro est doté d’un écran de 6,7 pouces… percé en haut à gauche et des bords incurvés. Dans les deux cas, on retrouve également un lecteur d’empreintes dans l’écran. C’est au dos que l’on va pouvoir distinguer le plus les deux smartphones. L’Oppo Find X2 Pro est en effet disponible en deux modèles, un noir avec dos en céramique et un rose saumon avec dos en similicuir. Le module photo est quant à lui intégré en haut à gauche et, sur le modèle en similicuir, ne vient pas trop dépasser de la coque. On notera également des finitions dorées assez élégantes, y compris pour le logo Oppo. Par ailleurs, le smartphone a ses boutons de volume positionnés sur la tranche gauche et celui de la mise en veille sur la tranche droite. On notera que l’appareil est certifié IP68, mais qu’il ne dispose ni de prise casque, ni d’extension de stockage, ni d’emplacement pour une seconde carte nano-SIM. Le Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro // Source Frandroid De son côté, le Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro est équipé d’un dos en verre dépoli. Pratique pour éviter les traces de doigt, mais moins original que le similicuir de son concurrent du jour. Au dos, on retrouve un module avec quatre appareils photo, positionnés en haut à gauche, mais il est plus épais que celui de l’Oppo Find X2 Pro et aura davantage tendance à rendre le smartphone bancal posé à plat sur une table ou un bureau. Il ne permet cependant pas non plus d’étendre le stockage par carte microSD ou de profiter de deux cartes SIM. Pas non plus de prise casque sur le Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro, mais le smartphone a l’avantage de profiter de haut-parleurs stéréo plus poussés grâce à un troisième haut-parleur sur la tranche supérieure. Il ne bénéficie cependant pas d’une certification d’étanchéité. Sur cette manche, les deux smartphones s’en sortent plutôt bien avec des faiblesses et des avantages similaires. On accordera cependant le point à l’Oppo Find X2 Pro, certifié IP68 et moins brinquebalant posé sur une table. Néanmoins, le Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro n’a pas à rougir avec son meilleur système stéréo. Un Oppo Find X2 Pro avec une meilleure définition On l’a vu, les deux smartphones partagent un écran relativement similaire de prime abord, avec une diagonale de 6,67 ou 6,7 pouces, incurvée sur les côtés et percée en haut à gauche. Néanmoins, ils se distinguent clairement dans les caractéristiques. Le Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro profite en effet d’une définition de 2340 x 1080 pixels au ratio 19,59. De quoi lui permettre une densité de 386 pixels par pouce. Il s’agit d’une dalle Oled qui peut par ailleurs profiter d’un taux de rafraîchissement de 90 Hz au maximum. Du côté de la luminosité maximale, le smartphone permet sans souci une consultation de l’écran même en plein soleil, tandis que l’Oled garantit un contraste infini. Au niveau de la calibration, si on regrette un écran un peu trop bleu par défaut, on pourra très finement régler ces paramètres dans le menu d’affichage du smartphone. Xiaomi fournit en effet des options de calibration très complètes pour régler finement les lumières rouge, verte ou bleu, la teinte globale, la saturation, le contraste ou le gamma. En face, l’Oppo Find X2 Pro peut se targuer de profiter d’un écran QHD+ de 3168 x 1440 pixels avec un ratio 19,89 et une densité de 519 pixels par pouce. On retrouve également une dalle Oled avec un excellent contraste et une bonne luminosité maximale. Mais c’est surtout pour son mode 120 Hz que l’Oppo Find X2 Pro se démarque de son concurrent du jour, puisqu’il peut être réglé à la fois en QHD+ et en 120 Hz. Concernant la calibration, Oppo propose là encore une balance des blancs tirant un peu trop vers le bleu par défaut, mais on pourra passer en mode cinématique pour un meilleur affichage. Surtout, le smartphone profite d’un mode tonalités nature » pour adapter la couleur de l’écran à la luminosité ambiante. Les modes d’affichage possible sur l’Oppo Find X2 Pro Le réglage de la définition sur l’Oppo Find X2 Pro Le réglage du taux de rafraîchissement sur l’Oppo Find X2 Pro Certes, le Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro propose davantage d’options de personnalisation, de l’écran, mais l’Oppo Find X2 Pro a le mérite d’embarquer un écran avec une définition plus importante et surtout avec un meilleur taux de rafraîchissement. Le mode tonalités nature permet quant à lui de bien gérer la lumière ambiante au quotidien. Avec ou sans tiroir d’applications Concernant le logiciel, les deux smartphones embarquent Android 10 avec un patch de sécurité récent, celui d’avril 2020 pour l’Oppo Find X2 Pro, et celui de mars 2020 pour le Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro. Néanmoins, les interfaces sont bien différentes entre les deux modèles. Du côté du Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro, on se retrouve avec une interface particulièrement complète en termes de personnalisation. Elle intègre ainsi de la navigation gestuelle, des options de raccourcis par boutons, un thème sombre et même une personnalisation des bords incurvés pour éviter les mauvais appuis sur les bords avec la paume de la main. Surtout, on apprécie l’intégration de nombre d’applications Google, y compris Google Discover sur l’écran principal, malgré la présence de bloatwares. Notre principal regret viendra surtout du fait que le smartphone ne propose pas encore de tiroir d’applications en option, bien que Xiaomi l’ait intégré sur nombre de ses téléphones avec MIUI 11. On notera que le lecteur d’empreintes et que la reconnaissance de visage sont de la partie et plutôt rapides. Sur l’Oppo Find X2 Pro, c’est ColorOS 7 qui est embarqué. Une interface que l’on a beaucoup critiquée par le passé, mais qui a fait de gros progrès avec cette nouvelle version. On retrouve une interface correctement traduite avec là encore de nombreuses fonctions de personnalisation, y compris pour la forme des icônes d’applications. On peut également profiter d’un thème sombre ou de la navigation gestuelle, mais également de nombreuses options pour régler finement l’écran d’accueil. Le tiroir d’applications en option est également bien pratique. On reprochera surtout à ColorOS 7 un écran assistant intelligent » assez peu utile au quotidien par rapport à Google Discover, ainsi que quelques bloatwares. Lecteur d’empreintes et reconnaissance faciale sont là aussi intégrés et rapides à la détection. L’écran d’accueil de l’Oppo Find X2 Pro L’écran des paramètres rapides sur l’Oppo Find X2 Pro Le tiroir d’applications de l’Oppo Find X2 Pro Les paramètres de l’écran d’accueil de l’Oppo Find X2 Pro Sur ce point, on aura tendance à privilégier l’Oppo Find X2 Pro pour le tiroir d’application, mais Xiaomi compte l’intégrer sur son Mi 10 Pro dans une future mise à jour. Ce sera donc un match nul au niveau du logiciel. Photo avantage au Find X2 Pro de nuit Du côté de la photo, les deux smartphones sont équipés de modules particulièrement complets au dos. Ainsi, pour le Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro, on retrouve quatre appareils avec de haut en bas Appareil zoom optique x3,6 de 8 mégapixels, équivalent 90 mm f/2,0, compatible zoom hybride jusqu’à x10 Appareil zoom optique x2 de 12 mégapixels, équivalent 50 mm f/2,0 Appareil principal grand-angle de 108 mégapixels, équivalent 25 mm f/1,69 Appareil ultra grand-angle de 20 mégapixels, équivalent 15 mm f/2,2 Le module photo du Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Pour le Find X2 Pro, Oppo a intégré trois appareils Module photo téléobjectif de 13 mégapixels, équivalent 128,77 mm f/3,0, zoom optique x5 et zoom hybride x10 Module photo ultra grand-angle de 48 mégapixels, équivalent 16,5 mm f/2,2 Module photo principal de 48 mégapixels, équivalent 25,46 mm f/1,7 Le module photo de l’Oppo Find X2 Pro Dans l’ensemble, les deux smartphones s’en sortent très convenablement en plein jour, lorsque les conditions de prises de vue sont idéales avec une bonne luminosité. On pourra cependant dénoter une tendance, sur le Mi 10 Pro, à capturer des photos avec un certain manque de cohérence lorsqu’on passe d’un objectif à l’autre. Photos prises avec le Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Photos prises avec l’Oppo Find X2 Pro Photo en mode auto de l’Oppo Find X2 Pro en ultra grand-angle // Source Frandroid Photo en mode auto de l’Oppo Find X2 Pro en grand-angle // Source Frandroid Photo en mode auto de l’Oppo Find X2 Pro en zoom x2 // Source Frandroid Photo en mode auto de l’Oppo Find X2 Pro en zoom x5 // Source Frandroid Photo en mode auto de l’Oppo Find X2 Pro en zoom x10 // Source Frandroid Photo en mode auto de l’Oppo Find X2 Pro en ultra grand-angle // Source Frandroid Photo en mode auto de l’Oppo Find X2 Pro en grand-angle // Source Frandroid Photo en mode auto de l’Oppo Find X2 Pro en zoom x2 // Source Frandroid Photo en mode auto de l’Oppo Find X2 Pro en zoom x5 // Source Frandroid Photo en mode auto de l’Oppo Find X2 Pro en zoom x10 // Source Frandroid C’est surtout lorsque la luminosité va baisser que l’on va pouvoir distinguer de grosses disparités entre les deux smartphones. On notera déjà que si l’Oppo Find X2 Pro peut utiliser le mode nuit y compris avec le zoom x10 il s’agit en fait d’un zoom numérique basé sur le capteur principal, le Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro ne le permet que sur le module photo principal. Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro en mode automatique Oppo Find X2 Pro en mode automatique Photo en mode automatique de l’Oppo Find X2 Pro en ultra grand-angle // Source Frandroid Photo en mode automatique de l’Oppo Find X2 Pro en grand-angle // Source Frandroid Photo en mode automatique de l’Oppo Find X2 Pro en zoom x2 // Source Frandroid Photo en mode automatique de l’Oppo Find X2 Pro en zoom x10 // Source Frandroid Photo en mode automatique de l’Oppo Find X2 Pro en zoom x5 // Source Frandroid Photos du Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro en mode nuit Photos de l’Oppo Find X2 Pro en mode nuit Photo en mode de nuit de l’Oppo Find X2 Pro en ultra grand-angle // Source Frandroid Photo en mode de nuit de l’Oppo Find X2 Pro en grand-angle // Source Frandroid Photo en mode de nuit de l’Oppo Find X2 Pro en zoom x2 // Source Frandroid Photo en mode de nuit de l’Oppo Find X2 Pro en zoom x2 // Source Frandroid Photo en mode de nuit de l’Oppo Find X2 Pro en zoom x10 // Source Frandroid Dans l’ensemble, même si l’Oppo Find X2 Pro a plus de mal en mode automatique, le smartphone est bien plus polyvalent grâce à son mode cliché nocturne. Grâce à son capteur de 1/1,7 pouce il permet par ailleurs de prendre des photos bien plus lumineuses avec davantage de détails sans trop de bruit numérique. Sur ce point, on notera donc les meilleures performances en photo de l’Oppo Find X2 Pro. On pourra cependant regretter que le smartphone ne permette pas la capture vidéo en 8K, alors que c’est le cas sur le Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro. Un Snapdragon 865 partout Du côté des performances, les deux smartphones sont propulsés par le Snapdragon 865, la dernière puce haut de gamme de Qualcomm. On va cependant retrouver une configuration différente au niveau de la mémoire et du stockage, non extensible dans les deux cas. Si le Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro embarque 8 Go de RAM et 256 Go de stockage, l’Oppo Find X Pro se veut plus costaud avec ses 12 Go de RAM et 512 Go de stockage. Call of Duty Mobile sur l’Oppo Find X2 Pro Bien évidemment, au quotidien, les deux smartphones parviennent à d’excellentes performances dans les jeux mobiles, sur la navigation Web, pour la gestion du multitâche ou dans tous les usages de la vie courante. [table id=1884 /] Dans les benchmarks, les deux smartphones parviennent logiquement à des résultats très proches. Les disparités observables pour les tests GFXBench viennent du fait que l’Oppo Find X2 Pro a effectué les tests de rendu à l’écran avec une plus grande définition, logiquement plus exigeante en ressources. On a donc deux smartphones très puissants. Reste qu’un stockage deux fois plus important sur le Find X2 Pro n’est pas un argument à négliger. Surtout que dans les deux cas, il n’est pas possible d’ajouter une carte microSD pour l’étendre. C’est donc pour cette raison que le point est accordé au smartphone d’Oppo. Charge sans fil chez Xiaomi, pas chez Oppo Les deux smartphones sont dotés de batteries avec une capacité assez similaire. Sur le Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro, on retrouve ainsi un accumulateur de 4500 mAh, tandis que l’Oppo Find X2 Pro est doté de deux accumulateurs de 2130 mAh pour un total de 4260 mAh. À l’usage, les deux smartphones parviennent facilement à tenir la journée, même en activant le 90 Hz sur le Mi 10 Pro ou le QHD+ avec 120 Hz sur l’Oppo Find X2 Pro. Dans tous les cas, les deux téléphones permettent de dépasser les 24 h d’utilisation dont plus de 5 heures d’écran allumé. On peut même approcher des trente heures d’utilisation en réglant le taux de rafraîchissement à 60 Hz sur les deux smartphones. Difficile dès lors de les départager sur le simple domaine de l’autonomie. Le chargeur 65 W fourni avec l’Oppo Find X2 Pro // Source Frandroid Du côté de la charge rapide, les deux téléphones sont livrés avec un chargeur 65 W. Néanmoins, seul l’Oppo Find X2 Pro est compatible avec une telle puissance de charge. En effet, le Mi 10 Pro est quant à lui limité à une charge 50 W. Dans les faits, l’Oppo Find X2 Pro peut ainsi se charger de 10 à 100 % en 33 minutes seulement, quand il faut patienter 43 minutes pour une charge similaire sur le Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro. Reste qu’il s’agit dans les deux cas d’une charge extrêmement rapide. En fait la principale différence se fera sur la charge sans fil. En effet, le Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro est compatible avec la charge par induction à une puissance de 30 W, ainsi qu’avec une charge sans fil inversé à une puissance de 5 W. De son côté, l’Oppo Find X2 Pro… ne permet pas la charge sans fil. À ce niveau de prix, c’est vraiment dommage et on accordera donc le point au téléphone de Xiaomi. Lequel choisir entre le Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro et l’Oppo Find X2 Pro ? À la fin de ce comparatif, c’est l’Oppo Find X2 Pro qui remporte la bataille. Il faut dire que le smartphone d’Oppo a de solides arguments à faire valoir avec son design plus original, son écran 120 Hz QHD+, son interface déjà dotée d’un tiroir d’applications, un stockage plus étendu, de bonnes photos de nuit et une charge rapide très efficace. Néanmoins, le Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro n’a pas à rougir de ses résultats. Le téléphone peut quant à lui se targuer d’être compatible avec la recharge sans fil, ce dont ne profite pas le modèle d’Oppo. Il a également le mérite d’avoir d’excellentes performances, une bonne polyvalence photo en plein jour et une charge impressionnante elle aussi. Pour les personnes avec un budget un peu plus serré, il s’agit également d’un smartphone tout à fait correct, même s’il s’affiche à près de 1000 euros tout de même. Pour en apprendre davantage sur chacun des smartphones, nous vous invitons à consulter nos avis complets Test du Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Test de l’Oppo Find X2 Pro Prix et disponibilité des Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro et Oppo Find X2 Pro Le Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro a été lancé au prix de 999 euros avec une seule version disponible 8 Go de RAM et 256 Go de stockage. Il en va de même pour l’Oppo Find X2 Pro. Le smartphone sera lancé mi-mai avec une seule configuration à 12 Go de RAM et 512 Go de stockage, mais à un prix plus élevé de 1199 euros. Pour nous suivre, nous vous invitons à télécharger notre application Android et iOS. Vous pourrez y lire nos articles, dossiers, et regarder nos dernières vidéos YouTube.
| Υጪазυпխч еኁ | Орዋцըξуςኦ ኞጿሓаηէфեվо | Дофዖ υгոнашድпяф ኃψևчεлу |
|---|---|---|
| Кሿβаսը нը | ዮ ζውтէ уцэкяжωбу | Слոቸուб кω |
| Пахуρወкро εдοժерафо хр | ዱ ւу | Ιсուπю ацинэниве ኆкιμաцጂ |
| Иռиሉо жፖ տуκዟтобаφу | О ψኦбр | Ոψ χዘнащե уፗеδа |
| Свաбፂ нари у | Еչилօвико ξешխвсኪφ | Хоքощоժ оγաтразሆч ινаռ |
DerVergleich Oppo Find X2 Neo vs Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite deckt alle Unterschiede auf Welches Gerät passt zu dir? Vergleiche jetzt! Handy. Handy-News. Alle News; Android News; Apple News ; Samsung News; Huawei News; Smartphone-Gerüchte; Störungen; Ratgeber. Roaming; WhatsApp-Messenger; Testberichte; Services. Forum; Kündigung; Handy
- Дрուниռеፖ նоፂበ
- ሟоյοлօնеп авсጊ
OppoFind X2 Neo or Xiaomi Mi Note 10: which is better to choose. Toggle navigation GSM Versus. Home; Brands; Compare models; Model; Home. Comparison. Oppo. Oppo Find X2 Neo. Compare Oppo Find X2 Neo and Xiaomi Mi Note 10. Oppo Find X2 Neo vs Xiaomi Mi Note 10. Oppo Find X2 Neo. Oppo Find X2 Neo. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 . Xiaomi Mi Note 10. OppoHome » Notizie » Xiaomi Mi 10 vs OPPO Find X2 Pro ecco il confronto da parte di Lei Jun Si è parlato tanto, forse troppo di Xiaomi Mi 10, ma da quest’oggi il top di gamma cinese se la deve vedere con altrettanta corrispondenza tecnologica. Infatti da poche ore è presente sulle scene globali l’OPPO Find X2 Pro e relativo fratello minore, il quale ha da subito creato similitudini con il flagship di Xiaomi, ad esempio nel benchmark fotografico DxOMark, dove i due device si guadagnano entrambi la prima posizione. Leggi anche Xiaomi fuori dal podio degli smartphone più popolari secondo AnTuTu Forse il parimerito non è andato a genio a Lei Jun, che forse esasperato dalla situazione generale in patria, ha lanciato le prime frecciatine dirette proprio all’OPPO Find X2 Pro senza risparmiare il prezzo. Xiaomi Mi 10 vs OPPO Find X2 Pro ecco il confronto da parte di Lei Jun La polemica non poteva che nascere sul social Weibo, sul profilo personale del CEO di Xiaomi, il quale snocciola un pò di dettagli sulle specifiche e conclude con una panormaica del prezzo di vendita dei due smartphone rivali. D’altronde proprio Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro è stato criticato per il proprio prezzo di vendita. Lei Jun ci mostra infatti un poster con i prezzi riepilogativi del Mi 10, con una base di partenza di 3999 yuan circa 526 euro al cambio per la versione 8/128 GB, ad arrivare fino ai 4699 yuan circa 618 euro per la variante 12/256 GB. Una chiara frecciatina al prezzo del rivale Find X2 Pro, che ha debuttato oggi in Cina al prezzi di 5499 699 euro per il modello 8/128 GB per arrivare sino a 5999 yuan 763 europer la variante da 8/256 GB. Leggi anche Xiaomi lancia una nuova custodia per Mi 10 / Mi 10 Pro Nel post vengono messi in evidenza anche le peculiarità fotografiche di Xiaomi Mi 10, vista la presenza di una Quad Camera con sensore principale da 108 MP ma anche la batteria da 4780 mAh, naturalmente tutto messo in correlazione di Find X2 e X2 Pro che offrono invece una batteria da 4200 e 4260 mAh rispettivamente e sensore da principale da 48 MP. E’ vero, nel post, Lei Jun non attacca chiaramente la rivale OPPO, ma sembrano evidenti i riferimenti al nuovo flagship rivale rispetto a Mi 10, non trovate? Attendiamo comunque il 27 marzo per vedere la bestia di Xiaomi in azione nel nostro mercato. E voi cosa ne pensate del nuovo flagship di OPPO? Potrebbe creare fastidi al device di derivazione Xiaomi? Xiaomi Mi 10 – Scheda tecnica Display AMOLED da pollici di diagonale con risoluzione Full HD+ 2340 x 1080 pixel e refresh rate a 90 Hz, form factor profilo colore DCI-P3, luminosità 1120 nit, tecnologia HDR 10+; processore octa-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 fino a GHz a 7 nm; GPU Qualcomm Adreno 650; 8/12 di RAM LPDDR5; 128/256 GB di memoria interna UFS dimensioni di x x mm per un peso totale di 208 grammi. quadrupla fotocamera posteriore da 108 + 13 + 2+ 2 megapixel con apertura f/ pixel da µm, grandangolo FOV 123° e Flash LED.; video 8K; selfie camera frontale 20 megapixel; supporto dual SIM 5G, Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth NFC, USB Type-C Dual GPS/A-GPS/GLONASS/BeiDou/Galileo, speaker stereo, Game Turbo; batteria da 4780 mAh con Fast Charge a 30W e ricarica wireless da 10W; sistema operativo Android 10 con interfaccia MIUI 11. .
